M, V Kairaly the only ship owned by Kerala
Shipping Corporation (KSC) sailed from Mar Goa
on 30th June 1979. Captain Mariyadas Joseph refused to sail the ship on 30th
since the radar of the ship was under repair. Sri.K .Sadasivan who was then the
liaison officer of the
corporation, a protégé of late Sri.M.N Govindan Nair the veteran CPI leader
gave an ultimatum to the captain to sail the ship on 30th June itself
due to reasons best known to himself. Although Capt Joseph resisted the
move and walked out of the
dinner party on the previous day after throwing soccers at Sadasivan,
finally relented and took the ship on
30th itself.
The last letter sent by the captain
to his wife Smt. Marykutty Joseph dtd;
26-6-79 clearly states that the radar had to be repaired and the ship
will sail only after 4 days meaning July 4th 1979.
Another unfortunate event was that
while the cargo was being loaded in to the ship two of the crew members fell in
to the sea but they could be rescued. Finally the ship sailed from the Mar Goa port
on the evening of 30th June 79 without radar carrying a cargo of 20,538
tons of iron ore to Rostock in East Germany .
There were communications from and to
the ship on 1st, 2nd, and 3rd July 79 through the Bombay Radio, the
official agency to communicate messages to and from the ship. There were
communications to the ship on 4th,5th and 6th July
by KSC .But obviously the ship did not seem to have received any of those
messages since there was no response from the ship .But when did KSC came to
know of this fact is a mystery . They say that they came to know of
it only on 16th July by an ordinary post from Bombay Radio which need
not be true. If it were a costly and irresponsible act on the part of Bombay
Radio what prevented KSC to contact Bombay Radio on 4th or 5th
july itself since there was no response from the ship after 3rd
july’79.Arguably if KSC had received the message from Bombay Radio as late as
16th july they did not have seemed to question Bombay Radio about
their irresponsible act. The likely chance is that KSC had information about
non- receipt of the messages by the ship much earlier from Bombay Radio unofficially.
On 11thth July the Mitcots
who were Kairali’s shipping agents in Djibouti
reported to KSC that the ship did not report at Djibouti for fuelling on 8th July
as was scheduled. Then only KSC says they came to know of the missing of the
ship. But KSC did not reveal this fact both to relatives of the crew and the
public at large which was a culpable offence on their part. The story appeared
in the Kerala press only on July 15th. They did not know anything
about a salvage operation nor do they have the wisdom to consult anybody in the
matter. There was hardly anybody in the KSC who was knowledgeable about
shipping .Their Managing Director at that time was one V.Vasudevan Nair IAS who
started off his career as a Tahasildar .One doubts whether he had ever visited or
seen the ship Kairali. After a lapse of 12
valuable days on 16th July or so the Indian Navy was alerted about
the matter and they undertook reconnaissance flights in the area. Since it was
monsoon time and owing to bad weather how deep they could have gone to the sea
is a mute question. The only piece of information available from them was that
a ship like Kairali was seen to be moving very close to Socotra Island
and no communication was possible with them. No debris or flotsam was located
to prove the contention that Kairali was sunk. After a round of flights in the
area from where Kairali had sent the last message they gave up the search
operations for the vessel. It seems, due to inclement weather and other factors
whether they had undertaken a thorough search operation is doubtful. .
Simultaneously the KSC took steps to claim the compensation from the insurance
company. Although the ship was bought at a lesser value it was over insured for
Rs. 6 Crores. It was a 2nd hand ship bought from Norway .Its original name being Oscarsord
re christened as Kairali.
On 23-7-79 the KSC received a lengthy
message from one Mr. George Daniel who happened to be the Managing Director of
a ship breaking company called “Pan Arab Shipping and Transporting Corporation”.
His contention could be summarized as “Owing to a variety of reasons the ship had
not sunk as is claimed by the KSC and they were willing to start a search operation
and if the ship is located they have to be paid a compensation of 2.8 lack US $
on a “No cure no pay offer”. It means the compensation amount need be paid if
only the ship is located afloat or sunken with conclusive proof. Information
regarding the message was kept as confidential. As per the information gathered
by KSC the Pan Arab Shipping and Transporting Corporation was only a ship
breaking company and they lacked the wherewithal to undertake such a salvage
operation. After a few days information regarding Pan Arab message came to
light among relatives of the crew and for them it was the
last straw on the camel’s back. An emergency meeting of the relatives of the
crew was held at Kottayam Paikda’s college and a Kairaly Action Committee was
formed with Sri Sebastian Paikada as convener and Prof. Babu Joseph as joint
convener .It was also decided to hold a sit in dharna in front of the KSC
office at W.Island cochin by the relatives of the crew on 28th July.
The then Managing Director of KSC one Sri V.Vasudevan Nair IAS had to face a
very unfriendly crowd when he reached his office late in the night from Trivandrum .
We the relatives of the crew insisted
on 2 things. 1.A high power committee with state chief secretary as chairman
with representatives of the relatives of the crew and a couple of shipping
experts had to be immediately constituted to enquire afresh in to the circumstances behind the
disappearance of the ship.2.A two member enquiry commission had to be
constituted to initiate a fresh discussion with Sri George Daniel MD of Pan
Arab Shipping and transporting Corporation Kuwait and also to hold discussions
with shipping circles abroad about the possibility of the ship Kairali being
pirated in high seas .It was also suggested that one of the 2 member enquiry
commission should be a shipping expert and the other a relative of the crew members
.Before an angry crowd of the relatives the MD had to accept both the
suggestions.
Since then events moved rather fast although
the heart of the shipping corporation was not in it. For them ship was already
lost in high seas due to factors unknown to them and they had very promptly
moved papers to claim the insurance amount. It was simply to assuage the
ruffled feelings of the relatives of the crew and to camouflage their own
incompetence and failure to undertake timely action to enquire in to the
disappearance of the ship were factors behind accepting our suggestions at gun point.
In fact what they ought to have done was to hire an helicopter on 4th
July itself when the ship failed to send the daily message to the last reported
site of the ship which was about 600 kms away from Margoa .How a ship like
Kairali a bulk carrier could have decimated at the dead end of night without
leaving a message or flotsam is still a mystery.
One Mr.R.Lakshmana Iyer who was a
ship surveyor at Cochin port and me representing
relatives of the crew were asked to undertake an enquiry both in Kuwait
and Saudi Aarabia to enquire in to the various possibilities behind Kairali
disappearance and to initiate talks with Mr.George Daniel who had offered a
search operation.
After obtaining the necessary visas
we started off our mission by the 1st week of Aug 1979.According to us,
the possibilities behind Kairaly disappearance were two.
1. Owing to bad weather and due to lack of vision
and waves to the altitude of 100 ft or above cargo shifting taking place in the ship and the vessel being broken in to
pieces within split seconds and sunk in high seas without getting a chance to
send an SOS.
2. The ship being pirated and crew members
taken to some uninhabited islands to fend for themselves and the ship being
taken to some safe havens.
Immediately after landing in Kuwait
we thought of initiating a discussion with Sri. George Daniel .His arguments
were the following.
1. When Kairaly was set to sail the
climate was not that bad. The meteorological department indicated it as 7 which
were not alarming. No thunder storm or hails were reported.
2. Kairaly was a bulk carrier with
independent 4 halls and the possibility for cargo shifting was remote
especially if the cargo is trimmed properly when it is being loaded in to the
ship.
3. Kairaly had 4 or 5 independent
communication systems in place and it is equally impossible for all the systems
to fail automatically and especially when the ship was passing through a very
busy shipping channel and any distress message could have been picked up any
ship passing by.
4. A ship of Kairaly’s dimension could
not have sunk without leaving any debris or flotsam. There are so many articles
in the ship which will float around including oil which was not seen by
anybody.
5. Sea piracy was a common thing in the
coast of Somalia and Aden even at that time and why the KSC failed to undertake
an enquiry on that basis and it is
possible that Kairaly could be taken to some ports and its name, colour and
even shape could be changed .In the worst case scenario ship could be taken to
some unidentified breaking units and could be broken or sold as scrap .The
chances are more since the ship had zero visibility in the absence of a radar
and under bad weather.
We were quite interested in our
discussions with George Daniel since he was engaged in ship breaking and
chances of his getting some information about a pirated ship was greater.
Incidentally Sri George Daniel was detained under Coffepoosa and was in Poojapura
central jail for sometime.
Why KSC delayed the search operations
and a No cure No pay offer from him was summarily rejected especially when it
did not involve any expenditure on the part of KSC.
We concluded our discussions with Sri
George Daniel after obtaining a verbal assurance from him that Pan Arab
Shipping and Transporting corporation will still be interested to undertake a
search operation if the Kerala Govt; shows real interested in the issue and the
matter was duly reported to Govt; of Kerala and to Smt. Jyothi Venkittachellam
who was then the Governor of the state.
From Kuwait
the enquiry commission went to Saudi
Arabia and had held extensive dialogues with
shipping authorities both in Dammam and Jidha
port. They were quite unanimous that sea
piracy is a common thing in Somalian coasts and nothing was done to prevent it
since it involved joint operations by a number of countries. But every thing
was on a discussion level at that point of time.
Now
it is a common knowledge that sea
piracy is taking place and we get stories of so many ships which pass through Aden get pirated including
some Indian ships. But in late 70s for the shipping circles in India
it was only a cock and bull story .So it will be quite logical to look in to Kairaly
disappearance from a piracy angle.
Was the ship Kairaly
Pirated in high seas; Some arguments in favour?
Every body admits the fact that sea
piracy is going on in the Somalian
Coast for quite sometime
and the governments came in to action quite late. Now the question is whether
Kairaly was sunk without having a chance to send distress messages or pirated
by unidentified gunmen who approached the ship at the dead end of night.
(1) The enquiry committee appointed to
conduct an exhaustive enquiry in to the disappearance of the ship had only a
limited mandate for visiting Kuwait
and S.Arabia for 10 days. Why we were not allowed to go to Djibouti from where Kairali ought
to have taken fuel and Kairaly’s agents being interrogated. A French operator
had gone on record as reported that Kairaly had taken fuel from Djibouti
as was scheduled .What was the basis of such a reporting. Do the records in Djibouti
has have something to substantiate it should have been enquired in to.
(2) One of the planes belonging to Indian
Navy had reported during their
reconnaissance operations had located a ship like Kairali moving very
close to Socotra Island with dim lights
on .Later on it was reported that it was another ship by name “Koyali”
belonging to Shipping Corporation Of India. Does it look the same?
(3) A captain of a ship owned by Shipping
Corporation of India (SCI) had reported to have passed through a ship like
Kairali with only one light on. When he tried to contact the ship even the one
light which was on was switched off. Why he was not interrogated?
(4) Muthu Lakshmi was the sister of
Thyagarajan who was a crew on board the ship Kairali. In all the previous
voyages he used to send a letter along with a greeting card to his sister Muthu
Lakshmi. One such greeting card with some scribbling on it had been received by
Muthu Lakshmi around the last week of
july 1979 which she thinks even today can only be from Thyagarajan. Nobody had
enquired in to the matter.
(5) One Abu Backer who was working in a
Singapore Shipping Company had sent a message to one of his friends Mohammed.
The content of the message was the following; “The ship Kairali was pirated
while it was sailing in the Arabian Sea by a
faction of PLO presuming that it is an American Oil Tanker and all the crew are
alive and the ship might have changed its name and colour”. What was the basis
of this message?
(6) That Kairali went without radar and
it could not have located pirates before they could attack the vessel.
(7) As per the report of the Meteorology
Dept. the climate was not that bad though it was monsoon time so that ship
could not have capsized without sending a distress message.
(8) Why did KSC not start their
reconnaissance operations on 4th july or on 5th when
messages were not received from the ship especially when they had received
messages continuously on july 1st, 2nd and 3rd.79
from the ship .It is quite obvious that the ship was not receiving messages
from the corporation through Bombay Radio and why were they not interrogated or
questioned to know about the alleged delay on their part in informing the
Corporation on such a vital issue. KSC say they received the fact of non
receipt of the messages send by them only by an ordinary post on 16th
July 79? Is that true?
(9) Why Capt; changed his mind and
decided to take the ship on 29th June itself succumbing to the undue
pressure exerted by KSC represented by its liaison officer Sadasivan.
(10) Does Kairaly have any other cargo
loaded in to it other than iron Ore. ?
(11) Were all the crew recruited from
Margoa real sailors or some elements who could have had some underhand dealings
with wheeler dealers?
(12) Why the KSC authorities approach the
insurance company in hot haste without getting any conclusive proof behind the
mysterious disappearance of the ship.
(13) Mr George Daniel who was an
underground goon was not interrogated properly and why we prevented him from
conducting a search operation since his was a” No cure No pay offer.”
The theory of Kairaly being sunk
1) Another theory being advanced against
Kairaly was that if the cargo in this case the iron ore if it were not properly
trimmed might shift and the ship might lose its balance and sink within split
seconds.
2) Sometimes ship might lie on 2 waives
and might break in to pieces and can go down. In both the cases; if at all the
arguments can be sound there is no tangible evidence to prove the contention
.It can at best be a gesticulation.
Who scuttled the discussions to
conduct a search operation by the Pan Arab Shipping and transport Company?
On our return from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia the
enquiry commission submitted a report to KSC and Govt; of Kerala on the assumption that the ship was pirated under
mysterious circumstances and the services
of Pan Arab Shipping and Transporting Corporation had to be used on a No
Pay No cure offer provided they are
willing to undertake such an operation .We insisted on that since the relatives
of the crew on board the ship were left with no other alternative in the
absence of a conclusive proof that the ship was sunk in the high seas due to an
episodic wave which prevented the ship from sending a distress message.
Although the KSC authorities and
Govt; level bureaucrats were quite opposed to any fresh enquiry; we managed to
convince Smt Jyothi Venkitachalam and she sent me to Sri George Daniel as her
emissary and persuaded him to enter in to a fresh agreement with Govt; of
Kerala to start an enquiry on a” No Cure No pay basis” .It was so unfortunate
that at Govt; level bureaucracy was dead against any such enquiry and Hon
.Governor had took her pen to sign the agreement .It was a Friday weekend and
the popular ministry was to be sworn in on Monday next. Suddenly the then water
and transport secretary Gopalakrishnan Nair rushed in to the discussion room
and stated that it is quite unbecoming on the part of the Hon .Governor to
enter in to the proposed agreement on the eve of a popular ministry taking
charge on Monday the next. Governor looked at my face and said” I myself
constitute the ministry now and I shall make it a part of the cabinet minutes
so that the popular ministry may officially sign the agreement. To my mind the
last nail on the coffin blocking an enquiry in to the ill fated ship was struck
by the bureaucrats who never wanted the truth about Kairaly to come out in the
open.
On my part I knew pretty well the
difficulty of convincing 18 ministers in place of one Governor and withdrew
unilaterally from the negotiations .Some of the relatives still tried with the
ministers but it didn’t see the light of the day due to intra- party squabbles.
Kairali some issues
(1) Why we bought the ship .at the first
instance?
(2) Do they conduct a feasibility study?
(3) Who were all involved in the purchase?
(4) Was there any kick back involved?
(5) Why did the ship sail in between India and East Europe
only?
(6)Were there
any political interests involved behind the purchase of the ship?
(7) Why was
someone knowledgeable about shipping was not appointed in KSC?
(8) Why the
bureaucracy at KSC and state level took an adversarial position against a
comprehensive enquiry in to the mysterious disappearance of the only ship owned
by Govt; of Kerala?
These and many other questions remain at the level of mystery
along with Kairaly and 51 lives on board the ship.
(Prepared by Prof.Babu
Joseph a member of the delegation to enquire in to the missing ship M.V.Kairaly
representing relatives of the crew on board the ship. He could be contacted Email.josephbabu1@yahoo.co.in
or (M) 9447115020